The Making of East Asia’s Electronics Champions
Palabras clave:
Resumen
En Asia oriental se logró un crecimiento sostenido y elevado mediante el desarrollo de sofisticados sectores de exportación, especialmente en electrónica, encabezados por “campeones” nacionales. Utilizando la experiencia de cuatro importantes empresas de semiconductores de Asia oriental, argumentamos que cuatro ingredientes de la cooperación entre empresas y Estado fueron fundamentales para su éxito: ambición, autonomía, rendición de cuentas y adaptabilidad. Esta interacción entre el Estado y la empresa implicó ambiciosos objetivos y políticas por parte del estado, combinados con la autonomía operativa de las empresas, una estricta rendición de cuentas por el apoyo recibido y la adaptabilidad al entorno cambiante. Además, la competencia nacional e internacional, la colaboración con multinacionales y consorcios de investigación y la innovación propia empujaron a las empresas hacia la frontera tecnológica.
Descargas
Altmetrics
Citas
Adelman, I., & E. Yeldan. 2000. Is this the end of economic development? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11.1-2, 95-109.
Aghion, P., et al. 2015. Industrial policy and competition. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7.4, 1-32.
Albrecht, C., C. Albrecht, & J. Hooker. 2009. Corruption from a cross?cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal.
Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford University Press.
Amsden, A. 1994. Why isn't the whole world experimenting with the East Asian model to develop? Review of the East Asian miracle. World Development 22.4, 627-633.
Barrett, E. 2020. Intel’s decline makes rival chipmaker TSMC the world’s 10th most valuable company. Fortune. July 27, 2020.
Becker, G. 1997. The economics of life. McGraw-Hill Press.
Benhassine, N., & G. Raballand. 2009. Beyond Ideological Cleavages: A Unifying Framework for Industrial Policies and Other Public Interventions. Economic Systems 33(4): 293–309.
Bionity, 2009. “Quintiles Opens Expanded Asia-Pacific Headquarters in Singapore”. November 6, 2009.
Boon, R. 2015. “Quintiles marks 20 years in S'pore's life sciences sector”. The Strait Times. November 19, 2015.
Brown, K. 2009. “Abu Dhabi to buy Chartered for $1.8bn”. Financial Times. September 7, 2009.
Business Wire, 2017. “QuintilesIMS is now IQVIA”. November 6, 2017.
Cain, G. 2020. Samsung Rising: The Inside Story of the South Korean Giant That Set Out to Beat Apple and Conquer Tech. Business & Economics Press.
Callon, S. 1995. Different Paths: The rise of Taiwan and Singapore in the global personal computer industry. Stanford University Press.
Callon, S. 1995. Divided Sun: MITI and the breakdown of Japanese high-tech industrial policy, 1975-1993. Stanford University Press.
Carlisle, P. 2018. “Japan’s Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Make Plea Bargain In Thailand Bribery Case”. Thailand Construction News.
Carpenter, S. 2012. Amakudari in the Ministries’ IAIs, Public Corporations, Research Institutes and Affiliated Agencies: the Insidious Side. In Japan’s Nuclear Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, 52-70.
Carpenter, S. 2015. "The Route to Heaven-on-Earth." in Japan Inc. on the Brink. Palgrave Macmillan, 65-76.
Chang, D. 2006. "Samsung moves: A portrait of struggles”, in Chang, D. (eds) Labour in Globalising Asian Corporations: A Portrait of Struggle. Asian TNC Monitoring Network Book Series. 3-64.
Chang, H.J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem Press.
Chang, P.L., & C.W. Hsu. 1998. The development strategies for Taiwan's semiconductor industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 45.4, 349-356.
Chen, J.H., & T.S. Jan. 2005. A variety-increasing view of the development of the semiconductor industry in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72.7, 850-865.
Cherif, R. & F. Hasanov. 2019. “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy”. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 19/74.
Cherif, R., & F. Hasanov. 2019b. “The Leap of the Tiger: Escaping the Middle-Income Trap to the Technological Frontier”. Global Policy.
Cherif, R., F. Hasanov, & G. Xie. Forthcoming. “Building on Swamp: Institutions for Industrial Policy in Developing Economies”.
Choe, S. 2009. Korean Leader Pardons Samsung’s Ex-Chairman. New York Times. December 29, 2009.
Choung, J., et al. Transition of latecomer firms from technology users to technology generators: Korean semiconductor firms. World Development 28.5, 969-982.
Chu, Y.W. 1998. Labor and democratization in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Asia 28.2, 185-202.
Cnet, 1998. Short Take: Lucent and Chartered Semiconductor to open Singapore facility. January 15, 1998.
Cnet, 2002. “Hitachi, UMC to launch joint wafer venture”. Cnet. January 2, 2002.
Colignon, R., & C. Usui. Amakudari: The hidden fabric of Japan's economy. Cornell University Press, 2003.
Culpan, T. 2017. Chipzilla Got Toppled. Bloomberg. March 21, 2017.
Dunning, J. 1981. “Explaining outward direct investment of developing countries: in support of the eclectic theory of international production”, in K. Kumar & M. McLeod (eds) Multinationals from Developing Countries. Lexington Press, pp. 1–22
Dunning, J. 1986. "The investment development cycle revisited." Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122.4, 667-676.
Estevez, D. 2015. “With Carlos Slim Leading The Way, Mexico's Billionaires Have A Better Year”. Forbes. March 3, 2015.
Finegold, D., P.K. Wong, & T.C. Cheah. Adapting a foreign direct investment strategy to the knowledge economy: the case of Singapore's emerging biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies 12.7, 921-941.
Fortune, 2020. “Hitachi, Global 500”. Fortune Magazine.
Freund, C. 2016. Rich People Poor Countries: The Rise of Emerging-Market Tycoons and their Mega Firms. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Freund, C., & M. Pierola. 2012. Export superstars. The World Bank Press.
Gomersall, S. 2005. Hitachi’s Entry into the European Railway Market. Japan Railway & Transport Review 42.
Ham, R., G. Linden, & M. Appleyard. 1998. The evolving role of semiconductor consortia in the United States and Japan. California Management Review 41.1, 137-163.
Han, S.J. 1988. South Korea in 1987: The politics of democratization. Asian Survey 28.1, 52-61.
Harrison, A., & A. Rodríguez-Clare. 2010. Trade, foreign investment, and industrial policy for developing countries. Handbook of development economics. Vol. 5., 4039-4214.
Hausmann, R., D. Rodrik, & C. Sabel. 2008. Reconfiguring industrial policy: a framework with an application to South Africa. Harvard University CID Working Papers No. 168.
Hermitanio, M. 2019. “Samsung Electronics Accounts For 20 Percent of South Korea's Exports in First Half”. Tech Times. August 20, 2019.
Hitachi, 2003. Hitachi Establishes "Hitachi Global Storage Technologies”. Hitachi News Release. Accessible at: https://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/E/2003/0106a/index.html
Hitachi, 2016. Hitachi to Make a Transition to a Market-Specific Business Structure with Strengthened Front-Line Functions. Hitachi Corporate Information. Accessible at: https://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/month/2016/02/160203a.html
Hong, S.G., 1997. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in East Asia: the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea. Edward Elgar Press.
Hood, S. 1996. Political change in Taiwan: The rise of Kuomintang factions. Asian Survey 36.5, 468-482.
Hsieh, Y.S., N.P. Lin, & H.C. Chiu. 2002. Virtual factory and relationship marketing—a case study of a Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company. International Journal of Information Management 22.2, 109-126.
Industry Canada, 2013. “Canada’s pharmaceutical industry and prospects”. Manufacturing and Life Sciences Branch, Industry Canada.
Jan, T.S., & Y.J. Chen. 2006. The R&D system for industrial development in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73.5, 559-574.
Jha, P., & F. Chaloupka. 2000. Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Johnson, C. 1982 MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford University Press.
Ju, S.S. 1997. Korea: Major Changes in the Fair Trade Commission. International Business and Law Journal 25, 463.
Jung, T., R. Graeff, & W. Shim. 2011. Good for Samsung is good for Korea: Image restoration strategies used by Samsung after a whistle-blowing corruption scandal. The Open Communication Journal 5.1.
Kato, Y. 1988. “Nihon no handotai sangyo ni okeru gijutsu kyoso to boueki masatsu.” In Keizai Keiei Ronshu 27 (4).
Katz, J. 2000. Structural Change and Labor Productivity in Latin American Manufacturing Industries 1970-96. World Development, 28 (9), 1583–1596.
Kim, Y. 1997. Technological capabilities and Samsung Electronics' international production network in Asia. Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 8, 517-527.
Koh, D.J. 1992. Beyond Technological Dependency, Toward an Agile Giant: The Strategic Concerns of Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. for the 1990s. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
Krishna, V., & S. Sha. 2015. Building science community by attracting global talents: The case of Singapore Biopolis. Science, Technology and Society 20.3, 389-413.
Kuwahara, Y., O. Okada, & H. Horikoshi. Planning research and development at Hitachi. Long Range Planning 22.3, 54-63.
Lee, C.W., R. Hayter, & D. Edgington. 2010. Large and latecomer firms: The Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company and Taiwan's electronics industry. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 101.2, 177-198.
Lee, J., and J., Slater. 2007. "Dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial rent-seeking and the investment development path: The case of Samsung." Journal of International Management, 13.3, 241-257.
Lee, S.Y., & P.R. Venkat. 2009. Abu Dhabi to Buy Chartered Semi, Seeking to Challenge Top Chip Firms. Wall Street Journal. September 8, 2009.
Lin, Y. 2003. Industrial structure, technical change, and the role of government in development of the electronics and information industry in Taipei, China. Asian Development Bank Economic Working Papers.
Lincoln, J., C. Ahmadjian, & E. Mason. 1998. Organizational learning and purchase-supply relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota compared. California Management Review 40.3, 241-264.
Liu, T.H., et al. 2005. Technology entrepreneurial styles: a comparison of UMC and TSMC. International Journal of Technology Management 29.1-2, 92-115.
Low, L. 1993. Challenge and response: Thirty years of the Economic Development Board. International Specialized Book Service Incorporated.
Mathews, J. 1999. A Silicon Island of the East: Creating a semiconductor industry in Singapore. California Management Review 41.2, 55-78.
Mathews, J. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21 st century globalization. Asia Pacific journal of management 23.1, 5-27.
Mathews, J.A. & D.S. Cho. 2000. Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Public Affairs Press.
McCann, P., & T. Arita. Clusters and regional development: Some cautionary observations from the semiconductor industry. Information Economics and Policy 18.2, 157-180.
Meaney, C. 1994. State policy and the development of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. The Role of the state in Taiwan’s development, 170-192.
Moon, H., & D. Lee. 2004. “The competitiveness of multinational firms: A case study of Samsung Electronics and Sony." Journal of International and Area Studies, 1-21.
MOST, 1985. “Report on Research and Development in Science and Technology.” Seoul, South Korea: Ministry of Science and Technology. (in Korean)
Murillo, D., & Y. Sung. 2013. Understanding Korean capitalism: Chaebols and their corporate governance. ESADEgeo Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics Position Paper 33.
National Library of Singapore, 2014. Singapore experiences its first post-independence recession. National Library of Singapore. Available at: https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/events/9f9489cf-5432-4797-bf66-fd1b3bab7a2b
Nellis, S., & Shepardson, D. 2020. Taiwan's TSMC to build Arizona chip plant as U.S.-China tech rivalry escalates. Reuters. May 14, 2020.
Neuman, S. 2018. Samsung's Lee Jae-Yong Walks Free After Court Reduces Bribery Sentence. NPR. February 5, 2018.
Okazaki, T. 2001. The Role of Holding Companies in Pre?War Japanese Economic Development: Rethinking Zaibatsu in Perspectives of Corporate Governance. Social Science Japan Journal 4.2, 243-268.
Ouyang, S. 2006. Agency problem, institutions, and technology policy: Explaining Taiwan's semiconductor industry development. Research Policy 35.9, 1314-1328.
Park, S.Y. 2008. “Samsung’s Strategic Planning Machinery Now Passes into History”. Pulse News. April 23, 2008.
Pharmaletter. 1995. “Quintiles To Set Up East Asia Office In Singapore”. Pharmaletter. March 13, 1995.
Pucik, V., & J. Lim. 2001. Transforming human resource management in a Korean Chaebol: A case study of Samsung. Asia Pacific business review 7.4, 137-160.
Pucik, V., & J. Lim. 2001. Transforming human resource management in a Korean Chaebol: A case study of Samsung. Asia Pacific business review 7.4, 137-160.
Ramu, S. 1999. Cyberspace & Repositioning Of Corporations. Universities Press, 1999. Pg. 107
Rasiah, R. 2013. "Macro, meso and micro coordination and technological progress: Catch up experiences of Samsung and Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing corporation." In Learning, Capability Building and Innovation for Development. Palgrave Macmillan, 202-221.
Rasiah, R., & Y.X. Shan. 2016. Institutional support, technological capabilities and domestic linkages in the semiconductor industry in Singapore. Asia Pacific Business Review 22.1, 180-192.
Rodrik, C. 2008. Normalizing industrial policy. Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 3.
Sakakibara, K. 1983. From imitation to innovation: the very large scale integrated (VLSI) semiconductor project in Japan. MIT University Press
Sato, Y. 2001. The industrial policy debate minus public relations: depoliticizing the history of semiconductor industry development in japan. Japan studies review 5, 61.
SEC, 2006. “CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD.” United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 20-F.
SEC, 2015. SEC Charges Hitachi With FCPA Violations. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Accessible at: https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-212.html
SFGATE. 2012. HP Links Up With Chartered to Make Chips in Singapore. January 30, 2012.
Shapiro, H., & L. Taylor. 1990. The state and industrial strategy. World Development 18.6, 861-878.
Sperling, Ed. 2009. Why The Chartered Semiconductor Acquisition Matters. Semiconductor Engineering. September 11, 2009.
Tarui, Y. 1980. Kyodo Kenkyusho ni okeru Kenkyu to sono Seika (The Reseaxch Activity in the Cooperative Laboratory and its Results)" in Kogyo Ghosa Keii, VLSI no Chumoku Kiso Gi.jutsu (The Remarkable Basic Technology for VLSI).
The Online Citizen, 2018. Large importation of foreign talents fails to save Chartered Semiconductor under Goh’s watch. July 20, 2018.
Tsui-Auch, L. 2004. Bureaucratic rationality and nodal agency in a developmental state: The case of state-led biotechnology development in Singapore. International Sociology 19.4, 451-477.
Ullah, Z. 2017. “How Samsung dominates South Korea's economy”. CNN Business. February 17, 2017.
USDA, 2019. “What Are the Different Types of Clinical Research?”. United States Food and Drug Administration. January 4, 2018.
Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market. Princeton University Press.
Wong, P. K. 1999. National Innovation Systems for Rapid Technological Catch-up: An Analytical Framework and a Comparative Analysis of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. Conference on National Innovation Systems, Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy, Rebild, Denmark, June 9-12.
Wong, P.K. 1999. National innovation systems for rapid technological catch-up: an analytical framework and a comparative analysis of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. DRUID Summer Conference.
Woo, M. 1991. Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. Columbia University Press.
World Bank, 1993. The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy: Summary. World Bank Press.
Yahoo Finance, 2020. “IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)”. Yahoo Finance. August 29, 2020.
Yeh, J.R. 2008. Democracy-driven transformation to regulatory state: The case of Taiwan." NTU Law Review 3, 31.
You, J.S. 2020. The changing dynamics of state–business relations and the politics of reform and capture in South Korea. Review of International Political Economy, 1-22.
Los artículos enviados para su evaluación en REM habrán de ser originales, no haber sido publicados con anterioridad, totalmente o en parte, tanto en otras revistas como en cualquier medio de difusión (incluyendo cualquier página web de acceso público), ni aceptados para su publicación, ni encontrarse en proceso de evaluación en otros medios de difusión. En caso de que un artículo sometido a evaluación no sea original, REM se reserva el derecho a no aceptar para su evaluación más artículos de sus autores. Una vez que los artículos comienzan el proceso de revisión, el derecho a imprimirlos y difundirlos corresponde a REM (tanto del artículo completo como partes del mismo, si REM considera que son partes sustanciales). El reconocimiento de este derecho se entiende implícito en la decisión del autor de someter el artículo a evaluación por REM. Estos derechos vuelven al autor en caso de que el artículo sea rechazado.
REM permite el acceso abierto completo a todos los contenidos publicados, lo que supone que todos los artículos estarán disponibles a los usuarios inmediatamente después de su publicación. El uso y distribución no comercial de los mismos está permitido siempre que se cite la autoría y fuente.
Los contenidos de REM se rigen bajo licencia Creative Commons (CC-BY): Se permite cualquier explotación de la obra, incluyendo una finalidad comercial, así como la creación de obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales también está permitida sin ninguna restricción.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
Todas las personas que han trabajado en el artículo deben aparecer como autores del mismo; y todos los autores deben haber realizado una contribución sustancial al mismo. Además, todos los autores deben estar de acuerdo con el orden en que aparecen sus nombres. En caso de disconformidad de algún autor con cualquiera de estos requisitos, REM se reserva el derecho a no publicar el artículo incluso estando aceptado para su publicación.
