Active Citizenship : Designing a Pathway Towards the Future
Palabras clave:
Ciudadanía activa, Empoderamiento, Sociedad civil, Democracia
Resumen
El Programa Cidadãos Activos (Fondo para Ciudadanos Activos), financiado por los EEA Grants y gestionado en Portugal por las Fundaciones Calouste Gulbenkian y Bissaya Barreto, tiene como objetivo fortalecer la sociedad civil y empoderar a grupos vulnerables. Promueve la democracia, los derechos humanos, la justicia social y el fortalecimiento de capacidades de las ONG.
Durante nueve meses, apoyamos a 25 proyectos mediante sesiones mensuales con los representantes de los mismos (un Grupo Consultivo), centradas en su progreso, objetivos y perspectivas en evolución sobre la ciudadanía activa. Estas sesiones proporcionaron a los participantes habilidades para potenciar el compromiso cívico dentro de sus proyectos.
Al fomentar la reflexión crítica, el Fondo para Ciudadanos Activos ha demostrado un gran potencial para mejorar la participación ciudadana y crear una sociedad más inclusiva y democrática. Este modelo podría adaptarse para apoyar la acción colectiva y la ciudadanía activa en otros contextos.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Altmetrics
Citas
Active Citizens Fund. (2021). Programme rules. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and Bissaya Barreto Foundation. https://gulbenkian.pt/cidadaos-ativos/wp-content/uploads/sites/42/2022/01/ACF-Programme-Rules_2021-002.pdf
Alegría M., Alvarez K., NeMoyer A., Zhen-Duan J., Marsico C., O’Malley I. S., Mukthineni R., Porteny T., Herrera C.-N., Najarro Cermeño J. (2022). Development of a youth civic engagement program: Process and pilot testing with a youth-partnered research team. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(1–2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12548
Amauchi, F.,Gauthier, J. F., Ghezeljeh, M., Giatti, A., L., Keats, L. L., Sholanke, K.D., . & Gutberlet, J. (2022). The power of community-based participatory research: Ethical and effective ways of researching. Community Development, 53(1), 3-20.
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060
Bailey, K., Allemang, B., Vandermorris, A., Munce, S., Cleverley, K., Chisholm, C., Cohen, E., Davidson, C., El Galad, A., Leibovich, D., Lowthian, T., Pillainayagam, J., Ramesh, H., Samson, A., Senthilnathan, V., Siska, P., Snider, M., & Toulany, A. (2024). Benefits, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in health research: Combining evidence-based and youth perspectives. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00607-w
Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Pachucki, M. C. (2019). Impacts of adolescent and young adult civic engagement on health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Child Development, 90(4), 1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12998
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de Conteúdo [Content Analysis]. Lisbon: Edicoes 70.
Barros, C., McGarrigle, J., Santos, A. S., Albert, I. & Murdock, E. (2023). Solidarity Typologies in Dynamics Between Portuguese Emigrants and Their Parents. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00368-0
Bärwalde, T., Hoffmann, L., Fink, A., Völlm, C., Martin, O., Bernard, M., Gebhard, B., & Richter, M. (2023). The adolescent concept of social participation—A qualitative study on the concept of social participation from adolescents with and without physical disabilities. Qualitative Health Research, 33(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221146414
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
Blum, R. W., Lai, J., Martinez, M., & Jessee, C. (2022). Adolescent connectedness: Cornerstone for health and well-being. BMJ, 379, e069213. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069213
Branquinho, C., Kelly, C., Arevalo, L. C., Santos, A., & Matos, M. G. (2020a). “Hey, we also have something to say”: A qualitative study of Portuguese adolescents’ and young people’s experiences under COVID-19. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(8), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22453
Branquinho, C., Tomé, G., & Matos, M. G. (2020b). Community-based Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) studies with focus on youth health and well-being: a systematic review. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(5), 1301-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22320
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Biological perspectives on human development. Sage Publications.
Chan, W. Y., Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2014). Adolescent civic engagement and adult outcomes: An examination among urban racial minorities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1829–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0136-5
Charmaz, K. (2009). A construção da teoria fundamentada: Guia prático para análise qualitativa. Artmed.
Consultative Group (2024). Contribution to the EEA grant Blue ebook at https://eeagrants.org/news/launch-blue-book-consultation
Citizenship and participation - Manual for human rights education with young people. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/citizenship-and-participation
Cohen A. K., Ozer E. J., Abraczinskas M., Voight A., Kirshner B., Devinney M. (2020). Opportunities for youth participatory action research to inform local educational authority decisions. Evidence and Policy, 16(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15649816542957
Dang, L, Seemann, A.-K, Lindenmeier, J, & Saliterer, I. (2022). Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility. Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 1736–1755.
Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H. and Gustafson, D.H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman Glenview.
European Comission (2023). European Democracy Action Plan: making EU democracies stronger. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ga/ip_20_2250
Falanga, R., & Ferrão, J. (2021). The evaluation of citizen participation in policymaking: Insights from Portugal. Evaluation and Program Planning, 84, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101895
Frasquilho, D., Ozer, E.J., Ozer, E.M., Branquinho, C., Camacho, I., Reis, M., Tomé, G., Santos, T., Gomes, P., Cruz, J., Ramiro, L., Gaspar, T., Simões, C., Piatt, A., Holsen, I., & Matos, M.G. (2018). Dream Teens: Adolescents-led participatory project in Portugal in the Context of the Economic Recession. Health Promotion Practice, 19(1),51-59. http://doi.org/10.1177/1524839916660679
Gallegos D., Durham J., Rutter C., McKechnie R. (2023). Working towards the active participation of underrepresented populations in research: A scoping review and thematic synthesis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1312525.
Gibbs, L., Kornbluh, M., Marinkovic, K., Bell, S., & Ozer, E. J. (2020). Using technology to scale up youth-led participatory action research: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2, Suppl), S14–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.019
Hoffmann, L., Völlm, C., Bernard, M., Fink, A., Richter, M., & Dawal, B. (2023). What does social participation mean? A qualitative study exploring the concept of participation from the perspectives of experts and parents. BMJ Open, 13(7), e072684. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072684
Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033004
Hopman, L., Kishimoto, S., Russell, B., et al. (2021). Democratic and collective ownership of public goods and services: Exploring public-community collaborations. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/democratic-and-collective-ownership-of-public-goods-and-services
Krick, E. (2022). Citizen experts in participatory governance: Democratic and epistemic assets of service user involvement, local knowledge and citizen science. Current Sociology, 70(7), 994-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211059225
Laurence, J. (2021). The impact of youth engagement on life satisfaction: A quasi-experimental field study of a UK national youth engagement scheme. European Sociological Review, 37(2), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa059
Law No. 1/2022. (2022, January 3). Diário da República, Série I.
Leme, V. B. R., Falcão, A. O., Morais, G. A. D., Braz, A. C., Coimbra, S., & Fernandes, L. D. M. (2016). Intergenerational solidarity family in Brazilian research: Integrative review of the literature. Revista da SPAGESP, 17(2), 37–52. https://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?pid=S1677-29702016000200004&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
Levasseur, M., Lussier-Therrien, M., Biron, M. L., Raymond, É., Castonguay, J., Naud, D., . & Tremblay, L. (2022). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: update and co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition. Age and ageing, 51(2), afab215.
Lindquist-Grantz, R., & Abraczinskas, M. (2020). Using youth participatory action research as a health intervention in community settings. Health Promotion Practice, 21(4), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918818831
Löfgren, M., Larsson, E., Isaksson, G., & Nyman, A. (2022). Older adults’ experiences of maintaining social participation: Creating opportunities and striving to adapt to changing situations. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 29(7), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1974550
Martinez, L. S., Howard, R. C., Schotland, M., Lobb, R., Battaglia, T., Stone, S., & Ozer, E. (2023). Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e261.
Matos, M. G., Tomé, G., Branquinho, C., Reis, M., Ramiro, L., Gomez-Baya, D., & Gaspar, T. (2020). Being positive, participative and flexible: tools to human development and progress. EREBEA – Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 10, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.33776/erebea.v10i0.4954
Matos, M.G., & Simões, C. (2016). From Positive Youth Development to Youth’s Engagement: the Dream Teens. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 8(1), 4-18.
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science: IS, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Nash, A., Kennedy, H., Abraczinskas, M., Ballonoff Suleiman, A., & Ozer, E. J. (2024). Examining the Intersection of Sociopolitical Development and Transformative Social and Emotional Learning Outcomes: An Integrated Approach in Youth Participatory Action Research. Youth, 4(2), 679-699.
Nomura, K., & Kobayashi, N. (2024). Gender Gaps in Strategies for Maintaining the Social Participation and Interaction of Older Adults with People in a Local Community. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), 3572577.
Ozer, E. J., Abraczinskas, M., Duarte, C., Mathur, R., Ballard, P. J., Gibbs, L., Olivas, E. T., Bewa, M. J., & Afifi, R. (2020a). Youth Participatory Approaches and Health Equity: Conceptualization and Integrative Review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12451
Ozer, E. J., Abraczinskas, M., Voight, A., Kirshner, B., Cohen, A. K., Zion, S., Glende, J. R., Stickney, D., Gauna, R., Lopez, S. E., & Freiburger, K. (2020b). Use of Research Evidence Generated by Youth: Conceptualization and Applications in Diverse U.S. K‐12 Educational Settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(1-2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12425
Park, S., Lee, J. Y., Notley, T., & Dezuanni, M. (2023). Exploring the relationship between media literacy, online interaction, and civic engagement. The Information Society, 39(4), 250-261.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Phan, V., & Kloos, B. (2023). Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1-2), 54-78.
Saud, M. (2020). Civic engagement, youth socialisation and participation in public spheres in Indonesia. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105669.
Schmid, H., Almog-Bar, M., & Nirel, R. (2024). Donation of Money, Volunteering, and Civic Engagement: How do they Relate to Intergenerational Transmission of Philanthropic Values? Voluntas, 35(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00575-x
Silverman, D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Sage Publications.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
Vus, V., Syurina, E., Brückner, T., Fradelos, E., Papathanasiou, I., & Omelchenko, L. (2021). Youth and Mental Health: Life Satisfaction, Well-being, and Societal Participation in the Context of a Transitioning State. Wiadomości lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960), 74, 1687–1694. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202107123
Wallerstein, N., Oetzel, J. G., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Boursaw, B., Dickson, E., Kastelic, S., & Duran, B. (2020). Engage for equity: A long-term study of community-based participatory research and community-engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 47(3), 380-390.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.
Zalewska, A. M. (2023). Citizenship activity in emerging adults: The role of self-esteem, social skills, and well-being. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/156763
Alegría M., Alvarez K., NeMoyer A., Zhen-Duan J., Marsico C., O’Malley I. S., Mukthineni R., Porteny T., Herrera C.-N., Najarro Cermeño J. (2022). Development of a youth civic engagement program: Process and pilot testing with a youth-partnered research team. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(1–2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12548
Amauchi, F.,Gauthier, J. F., Ghezeljeh, M., Giatti, A., L., Keats, L. L., Sholanke, K.D., . & Gutberlet, J. (2022). The power of community-based participatory research: Ethical and effective ways of researching. Community Development, 53(1), 3-20.
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060
Bailey, K., Allemang, B., Vandermorris, A., Munce, S., Cleverley, K., Chisholm, C., Cohen, E., Davidson, C., El Galad, A., Leibovich, D., Lowthian, T., Pillainayagam, J., Ramesh, H., Samson, A., Senthilnathan, V., Siska, P., Snider, M., & Toulany, A. (2024). Benefits, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in health research: Combining evidence-based and youth perspectives. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00607-w
Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Pachucki, M. C. (2019). Impacts of adolescent and young adult civic engagement on health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Child Development, 90(4), 1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12998
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de Conteúdo [Content Analysis]. Lisbon: Edicoes 70.
Barros, C., McGarrigle, J., Santos, A. S., Albert, I. & Murdock, E. (2023). Solidarity Typologies in Dynamics Between Portuguese Emigrants and Their Parents. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00368-0
Bärwalde, T., Hoffmann, L., Fink, A., Völlm, C., Martin, O., Bernard, M., Gebhard, B., & Richter, M. (2023). The adolescent concept of social participation—A qualitative study on the concept of social participation from adolescents with and without physical disabilities. Qualitative Health Research, 33(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221146414
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
Blum, R. W., Lai, J., Martinez, M., & Jessee, C. (2022). Adolescent connectedness: Cornerstone for health and well-being. BMJ, 379, e069213. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069213
Branquinho, C., Kelly, C., Arevalo, L. C., Santos, A., & Matos, M. G. (2020a). “Hey, we also have something to say”: A qualitative study of Portuguese adolescents’ and young people’s experiences under COVID-19. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(8), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22453
Branquinho, C., Tomé, G., & Matos, M. G. (2020b). Community-based Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) studies with focus on youth health and well-being: a systematic review. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(5), 1301-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22320
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Biological perspectives on human development. Sage Publications.
Chan, W. Y., Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2014). Adolescent civic engagement and adult outcomes: An examination among urban racial minorities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1829–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0136-5
Charmaz, K. (2009). A construção da teoria fundamentada: Guia prático para análise qualitativa. Artmed.
Consultative Group (2024). Contribution to the EEA grant Blue ebook at https://eeagrants.org/news/launch-blue-book-consultation
Citizenship and participation - Manual for human rights education with young people. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/citizenship-and-participation
Cohen A. K., Ozer E. J., Abraczinskas M., Voight A., Kirshner B., Devinney M. (2020). Opportunities for youth participatory action research to inform local educational authority decisions. Evidence and Policy, 16(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15649816542957
Dang, L, Seemann, A.-K, Lindenmeier, J, & Saliterer, I. (2022). Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility. Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 1736–1755.
Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H. and Gustafson, D.H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman Glenview.
European Comission (2023). European Democracy Action Plan: making EU democracies stronger. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ga/ip_20_2250
Falanga, R., & Ferrão, J. (2021). The evaluation of citizen participation in policymaking: Insights from Portugal. Evaluation and Program Planning, 84, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101895
Frasquilho, D., Ozer, E.J., Ozer, E.M., Branquinho, C., Camacho, I., Reis, M., Tomé, G., Santos, T., Gomes, P., Cruz, J., Ramiro, L., Gaspar, T., Simões, C., Piatt, A., Holsen, I., & Matos, M.G. (2018). Dream Teens: Adolescents-led participatory project in Portugal in the Context of the Economic Recession. Health Promotion Practice, 19(1),51-59. http://doi.org/10.1177/1524839916660679
Gallegos D., Durham J., Rutter C., McKechnie R. (2023). Working towards the active participation of underrepresented populations in research: A scoping review and thematic synthesis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1312525.
Gibbs, L., Kornbluh, M., Marinkovic, K., Bell, S., & Ozer, E. J. (2020). Using technology to scale up youth-led participatory action research: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2, Suppl), S14–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.019
Hoffmann, L., Völlm, C., Bernard, M., Fink, A., Richter, M., & Dawal, B. (2023). What does social participation mean? A qualitative study exploring the concept of participation from the perspectives of experts and parents. BMJ Open, 13(7), e072684. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072684
Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033004
Hopman, L., Kishimoto, S., Russell, B., et al. (2021). Democratic and collective ownership of public goods and services: Exploring public-community collaborations. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/democratic-and-collective-ownership-of-public-goods-and-services
Krick, E. (2022). Citizen experts in participatory governance: Democratic and epistemic assets of service user involvement, local knowledge and citizen science. Current Sociology, 70(7), 994-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211059225
Laurence, J. (2021). The impact of youth engagement on life satisfaction: A quasi-experimental field study of a UK national youth engagement scheme. European Sociological Review, 37(2), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa059
Law No. 1/2022. (2022, January 3). Diário da República, Série I.
Leme, V. B. R., Falcão, A. O., Morais, G. A. D., Braz, A. C., Coimbra, S., & Fernandes, L. D. M. (2016). Intergenerational solidarity family in Brazilian research: Integrative review of the literature. Revista da SPAGESP, 17(2), 37–52. https://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?pid=S1677-29702016000200004&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
Levasseur, M., Lussier-Therrien, M., Biron, M. L., Raymond, É., Castonguay, J., Naud, D., . & Tremblay, L. (2022). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: update and co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition. Age and ageing, 51(2), afab215.
Lindquist-Grantz, R., & Abraczinskas, M. (2020). Using youth participatory action research as a health intervention in community settings. Health Promotion Practice, 21(4), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918818831
Löfgren, M., Larsson, E., Isaksson, G., & Nyman, A. (2022). Older adults’ experiences of maintaining social participation: Creating opportunities and striving to adapt to changing situations. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 29(7), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1974550
Martinez, L. S., Howard, R. C., Schotland, M., Lobb, R., Battaglia, T., Stone, S., & Ozer, E. (2023). Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e261.
Matos, M. G., Tomé, G., Branquinho, C., Reis, M., Ramiro, L., Gomez-Baya, D., & Gaspar, T. (2020). Being positive, participative and flexible: tools to human development and progress. EREBEA – Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 10, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.33776/erebea.v10i0.4954
Matos, M.G., & Simões, C. (2016). From Positive Youth Development to Youth’s Engagement: the Dream Teens. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 8(1), 4-18.
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science: IS, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Nash, A., Kennedy, H., Abraczinskas, M., Ballonoff Suleiman, A., & Ozer, E. J. (2024). Examining the Intersection of Sociopolitical Development and Transformative Social and Emotional Learning Outcomes: An Integrated Approach in Youth Participatory Action Research. Youth, 4(2), 679-699.
Nomura, K., & Kobayashi, N. (2024). Gender Gaps in Strategies for Maintaining the Social Participation and Interaction of Older Adults with People in a Local Community. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), 3572577.
Ozer, E. J., Abraczinskas, M., Duarte, C., Mathur, R., Ballard, P. J., Gibbs, L., Olivas, E. T., Bewa, M. J., & Afifi, R. (2020a). Youth Participatory Approaches and Health Equity: Conceptualization and Integrative Review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12451
Ozer, E. J., Abraczinskas, M., Voight, A., Kirshner, B., Cohen, A. K., Zion, S., Glende, J. R., Stickney, D., Gauna, R., Lopez, S. E., & Freiburger, K. (2020b). Use of Research Evidence Generated by Youth: Conceptualization and Applications in Diverse U.S. K‐12 Educational Settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(1-2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12425
Park, S., Lee, J. Y., Notley, T., & Dezuanni, M. (2023). Exploring the relationship between media literacy, online interaction, and civic engagement. The Information Society, 39(4), 250-261.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Phan, V., & Kloos, B. (2023). Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1-2), 54-78.
Saud, M. (2020). Civic engagement, youth socialisation and participation in public spheres in Indonesia. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105669.
Schmid, H., Almog-Bar, M., & Nirel, R. (2024). Donation of Money, Volunteering, and Civic Engagement: How do they Relate to Intergenerational Transmission of Philanthropic Values? Voluntas, 35(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00575-x
Silverman, D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Sage Publications.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
Vus, V., Syurina, E., Brückner, T., Fradelos, E., Papathanasiou, I., & Omelchenko, L. (2021). Youth and Mental Health: Life Satisfaction, Well-being, and Societal Participation in the Context of a Transitioning State. Wiadomości lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960), 74, 1687–1694. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202107123
Wallerstein, N., Oetzel, J. G., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Boursaw, B., Dickson, E., Kastelic, S., & Duran, B. (2020). Engage for equity: A long-term study of community-based participatory research and community-engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 47(3), 380-390.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.
Zalewska, A. M. (2023). Citizenship activity in emerging adults: The role of self-esteem, social skills, and well-being. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/156763
Publicado
2025-08-01
Cómo citar
Gaspar de Matos, M., Branquinho, C., Winer, E., Barros, C., Tara Mathur, R., Malta Cruz, M., Gaspar, T., & Ozer, E. J. (2025). Active Citizenship : Designing a Pathway Towards the Future. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 51(187), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.33776/amc.v51i187.9103
Número
Sección
Artículos
Derechos de autor 2025 Cátia Branquinho
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Al remitir una propuesta, el/la autor/a acuerda con los términos siguientes:
a) El/la autor/a conserva los derechos de autor y cede a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de la obra.
b) Los textos se difundirán con la licencia de reconocimiento Creative Commons 4.0. BY-NC-SA que permite a terceros recombinar, retocar y desarrollar la obra para fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando reconozcan la autoría y licencien sus creaciones nuevas bajo condiciones idénticas.
