Exploring Code-Based Feedback Options and Processing Patterns of L2 Writers: A Focus on Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback

Christina Torres; Florin M.  Mihai

doi:10.33776/EUHU/linguodidactica.v6.8847

Christina Torres University of Central Florida (USA) https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5966-8539
Florin M. Mihai University of Central Florida (USA) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3428-6388

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/EUHU/linguodidactica.v6.8847

Keywords:

Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Writing (composition), Learning process, Feedback (learning)

Abstract

Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback (DWCF) is a valuable approach for language instructors and students because it focuses on principles of learner needs as well as manageability, meaningfulness, timeliness, and constancy (Evans et al., 2010). This study investigated patterns that intermediate and advanced English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students demonstrated as they processed and applied DWCF using editing or color feedback codes in individualized tutoring sessions over a 16-week semester. To accomplish this goal, eleven participants engaged in DWCF sessions conducted live online and recorded with shared screen capture. Concurrent verbal report data (Ericsson & Simon, 1993) collected from forty sessions was transcribed and analyzed qualitatively using Storch and Wigglesworth’s (2010) language related episodes (LREs) as a guide. Verbal report data was triangulated with concurrent screen capture actions. This article presents findings for patterns regarding language form-focused LREs, such as verb tenses, article use, and prepositions. Findings revealed that participants applying DWCF with color codes generally had more patterns of extensive engagement compared to participants using editing codes feedback. However, extensive engagement was not necessarily paired with expected resolutions. This study supports continued use of editing codes for DWCF and presents some questions about feedback tracking charts within DWCF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Author Biographies

Christina Torres, University of Central Florida (USA)

Christina Torres is an Assistant Professor of TESOL in the Modern Languages and Literatures Department at the University of Central Florida. Her research interests include second language writing, written corrective feedback, teacher training, and instructional design. She is a principal investigator and coordinator for the virtual Center of Language Outreach, Research, and Study (COLORS) at UCF.

Florin M. Mihai, University of Central Florida (USA)

Florin M. Mihai is a Professor of TESOL and the Director of the Undergraduate TEFL Certificate in the Modern Languages and Literatures Department at the University of Central Florida. His research interests and publications focus on pre- and in-service teacher education and language and content-area assessment for multilingual learners.

References

Bitchener, J., (2019) The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed). (pp. 85-105). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Bitchener, J. & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095056

Bowles, M. A. (2010a). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. Routledge.

Brown, D. (2010, March). Reshaping the value of grammatical feedback on L2 writing using colors. Paper presented at the International TESOL Convention, Boston, MA.

Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research: An introduction to the theory and practice of second language research for graduate/master's students in TESOL and applied linguistics, and others. Oxford University Press.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 students writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Cotos, E. (2011). Potential of automated writing evaluation feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 420. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.420-459

Dekeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Ed.). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. (pp. 97-113). Erlbaum.

Ekanayaka, W. I., & Ellis, R. (2020). Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition? System, 94, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102341

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. MIT Press.

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., & Strong-Krause, D. (2011). The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners. System, 39(2), 229-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.012

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173290

Ferris, D. R. (2022). Feedback on L2 student writing: Current trends and future directions. In Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106609

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgecock, J. S. (2023). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (4th ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004943-1

Ferris, D., & Kurzer, K. (2019) Does error feedback help L2 writers? In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed). (pp. 106-124). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.008

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2012). The differential effects of comprehensive corrective feedback on L2 writing accuracy. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 3(2), 217–247. https://linguisticsandlanguageteaching.blogspot.com/2012/11/journal-of-linguistics-and-language.html

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30-Week Study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2), 6-34. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol1/iss2/2

Hartshorn, K. J., Rice, S. H., Eckstein, G., & Evans, N. W. (2023). Dynamic written corrective feedback frequency and its effects on ESL writing fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Feedback Research in Second Language, 1, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.32038/frsl.2023.01.02

Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522

Kurzer, K. (2018a). Dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental multilingual writing classes. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 5-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522

Kurzer, K. (2018b). Student perceptions of dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental multilingual writing classes. Journal of Response to Writing, 4(2). 34–68. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol4/iss2/3

Kurzer, K. (2019). Dynamic written corrective feedback in a community college ESL writing class setting. In S. M. Anwaruddin (Ed.), Knowledge mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and practice. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392472

Qi, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 277–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7

Shvidko, E. (2015, May 1). Written feedback: Using color-coded comments [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blog.tesol.org/written-feedback-using-color-coded-comments/

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371

Valentin-Rivera, L., & Yang, L. (2021). The effects of digitally mediated multimodal indirect feedback on narrations in L2 Spanish writing: Eye tracking as a measure of noticing. Languages, 6(4), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040159

Yang, C., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2020). The reactivity of think-alouds in writing research: quantitative and qualitative evidence from writing in English as a foreign language. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 451-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09970-7